4695
Newbie
Posts: 37
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2009, 06:24:43 AM » |
|
I've built wooden DN masts of strip and Goodwin design, and remember the painful rules migration path, from wood, (but not veneer), to ok some fiberglass, to glass, to what we have today. None of the masts I built exist today, except the surviving halves of one cut up as trophy stock.
If memory serves, the year Jeff Kent won the worlds on Lake Geneva, (in the wood mast days) about half the gold fleet suffered at least one DNF due to mast failure in one day.
Wood spars have a high mortality rate, Competing a DN actively with a wood mast is a two spars a year program, the composite spars have a much much lower failure rate, I understand the Jeff Kent, CSI spars have a mortality rate near 0. From a total cost of ownership viewpoint, that's ton's cheaper than wood if you sail.
In the roughly ten years since we began allowing fiberglass/composite spars, I've lost only one composite spar, due entirely to personal greed for speed on the racecourse, that is, I suspect there isn't a DN mast that I couldn't have pulled down on that leg of the course.
Then there's that speed thing... tuning a wood mast is a lengthy process, and it's always done post production, putting the glass/carbon (don't be sanding carbon) on is fast, sanding it back until it's happy isn't. The composites by almost all makers have standardized deflection characteristics that are substantially defined in the layup process.
To Bob's construction tips, the patio door rollers work great for a sheive, and pvc is just fine for a luff tube, (aluminum luff tubes/wood spars together make a large and pretty good thermostat, aluminum and carbon fiber combine to make a pretty good battery).
|